-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACHA PEACE BULLETIN

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/ACHAPeaceBulletin

A publication of Association for Communal Harmony in Asia (ACHA) www.asiapeace.org

 

Editors:

David Campion, PhD           campion@lclark.edu

Pritam K. Rohila, PhD          pritam@open.org

 

Subscription is free.

To SUBSCRIBE, email a request to ACHAPeaceBulletin-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email the request to ACHAPeaceBulletin-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

­­­

 

 

Volume VIII, No. 1, January 16, 2005, Next Issue, February 15, 2005

 

CONTENTS

 

EDITORIAL

 

PEACE & HARMONY NEWS FROM & ABOUT SOUTH ASIA

Pakistan-India

Sri Lanka

 

PEACE & HARMONY ORGANIZATIONS

 

REPORTS & ANALYSES

 

PEACE EVENTS

 

(Readers are invited to submit similar information from other areas of South Asia to help us broaden of our coverage. Please send the info to pritamr@open.org, a week before the date of publication of the next issue of the ACHA Peace Bulletin)

 

 

 

EDITORIAL

 

“Nature: the Great Equalizer”

David Campion

 

On December 26th 2004, South and Southeast Asia experienced one of the most devastating natural disasters in living memory.  An undersea earthquake off the coast of the Indonesian island of Sumatra set in motion a series of tidal surges that, at latest count, has claimed the lives of over 155,000 people in a dozen countries.

 

Even now, weeks later, as the enormity of this event is beginning to sink in, it is hard for us to make sense of it.  Indeed, there is no rational explanation that gives meaning to such a dreadful loss of life, even as the seismic and oceanographic factors that caused it can be plotted with mathematical precision and scientific rationality.  Manmade disasters are in some – albeit limited – sense easier to explain.  The decades of conflict in Kashmir, Nepal, and Sri Lanka; the tragedy in Bhopal; the riots in Gujarat, etc. – these can all be ascribed to man’s own ignorance, fear, corruption, lust for power, or fanatical blindness.  At the very least, in these cases we can demand accountability, commit ourselves to eradicating the source of the problem, and hope and pray that our Creator can forgive the weaknesses of His own creation.  But what can we say about an act of nature that in one day surpasses in violence and death the most determined efforts of the most evil among us to accomplish the same end?

 

At the outset, the images of the Tsunami and its aftermath provide us with a sobering reminder of the terrible power of nature.  In South Asia it is especially easy to forget this since there are so many occasions to witness the beauty and benevolence of nature.  Locals and visitors alike are awestruck by the majesty of the Himalayan peaks; the Eden-like serenity of the Kerala backwaters; the beauty of a Maldives sunset; the life-giving monsoon rains that drench some of the most fertile farmland in the world; and the fish-teeming seas into which South Asian fishermen have cast their nets for millennia.  But nature is also capable of a level of destructiveness and cruelty that makes our own human efforts to cause harm appear puny by comparison.  In one day, over two and a half times the total number of people killed in the Kashmir conflict perished along the shores of the Indian Ocean.  Nature, it seems, proved to be as merciless as even the most remorseless murderers and hardheaded bigots.  Homes, shops, and hotels were smashed to pieces.  Cars, buses, and trains were tossed about like toys in a bathtub.  And tens of thousands of bodies were swept away forever or washed ashore days later so disfigured that they remained unrecognizable to even their closest loved ones.

 

So what meaning can we ascribe to this occurrence?  How can those who lost their loved ones ever explain this event to themselves in a way that makes sense?  The answer for many is that there is no explanation.  But for those of us committed to peace in this region, there are some salient observations we can take from this catastrophe.

 

The first is that as individual human beings we have been reminded of our smallness and utter insignificance in the larger scheme of the natural world.  A much needed lesson in humility, indeed.  Perhaps this may help diminish the egotism, false pride, and sanctimonious that are at the heart of much of the violence and conflict in our world.  Clearly, when the forces of nature converge, we humans do not count for much. 

 

Secondly, we may take note of the fact that whatever differences among us we persist in believing are so important, and which have divided communities for decades, were of absolutely no consequence on December 26th.  Tamil and Sinhalese alike were swept away; Asian and European faces filled the photos on the notice boards as family and friends searched for them.  Moreover, if we believe that the manner in which we worship God leads him to favor us over others who worship differently, there was no evidence of this on December 26th.  Muslims, Hindus, Christians, and Buddhists perished together.  Distance, too, was no protection as fishermen in Somalia faced the same wrath as European sunbathers on the beaches of Thailand.  Nor were the distinctions of wealth, age, nationality, caste, and gender, which matter so much to us, of any interest to the sea.  It gathered up all people in its path and did not bother to sort one from another as it carried them away: men and women, rich and poor, Brahman and Sudra, Westerner and Asian, children and the elderly…  Mother Nature, it seems, is oblivious to the finer distinctions by which we separate ourselves from each other and which animate our fears and fuel our intolerance.  Either that, or she just doesn’t care as much about those differences as we do.  She is indeed the great equalizer.

 

Yet, in the aftermath of the Tsunami, we can learn a more hopeful lesson as the consequences and work ahead have forced us to acknowledge our common humanity.  There are signs of it everywhere.  We have seen it in the British and Australian marines offloading helicopters laden with food and medical supplies into the desperate arms of Sri Lankan villagers.  We have seen it in the Thai hotel clerks and shopkeepers comforting distraught Scandinavian tourists even as their own loved ones remained unaccounted for.  We have seen it in the hundreds of charity drives that have been undertaken in temples, mosques, and churches in places as diverse as Los Angeles, Manchester, Tokyo, Toronto, and Sydney.  We have seen it in the exhausted doctors and in the inexplicable cheerfulness of orphaned children.  We have seen it the stories of survivors being plucked from the sea after clinging to floating debris for days; small victories in the midst of terrible loss.  These examples may not be enough to assuage the grief of those mourning loved ones or searching for those still missing, but they can offer solace and hope for many of the rest of us as they remind of the best qualities of human nature.

 

Sadly, just a few weeks after the Tsunami struck there are signs of familiar patterns reemerging.  There have been reports of airlifted supplies bound for Andaman islanders seized on the tarmac by the Indian Government to the bafflement and frustration of relief workers.  In Indonesia, the desperately needy regions of the embattled Aceh Province have been declared “off-limits” by authorities, thus curtailing the ability of relief workers to move around there.  And most distressing of all, is news from Northern Sri Lanka that thousands of orphaned children are being recruited by Tamil rebels for training and indoctrination as the next generation of child soldiers in a civil war that has lasted a quarter century.

 

As 2005 begins, the work of ACHA remains as important as ever.  The Tsunami has paradoxically shown us how utterly insignificant all our lives are in the grand plan of nature, and yet how infinitely priceless is each individual life.  Perhaps this spirit of common humanity and chastened humility can help advance efforts for peace throughout South Asia – from the cautious optimism of the Indo-Pakistani peace efforts in Kashmir to the work ahead in rebuilding the lives of millions of Sri Lankans in an atmosphere of peace and political stability.  The path to peace remains a difficult one, though the events of recent weeks have helped level it a bit.  It is up to us now to keep moving forward.

 

 

PEACE & HARMONY NEWS FROM & ABOUT SOUTH ASIA

 

*Pakistan-India

 

India-Pakistan’s “Parallel Diplomacy”

By Aamer Ahmed Khan, BBC News, Karachi, 10 January 2005

 

Has people-to-people contact between Pakistan and India, often referred to as Track II or parallel diplomacy, reached critical mass?

 

“It is unstoppable now,” says Imtiaz Alam, the founding father and current secretary general of the South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA), a Pakistani NGO aggressively pushing public-level contact between the two South Asian neighbors.  Mr Alam’s optimism is easily understood.  After a long and sluggish march through much of the last decade, the year 2004 saw cultural exchanges between Pakistan and India reach unprecedented proportions.

 

Over 500 Indians, including intellectuals, politicians, former bureaucrats, retired soldiers, showbiz and media personalities, visited Pakistan as part of these parallel efforts.  Other than that, hordes of Indians descended upon Lahore to watch their boys take on the Pakistan cricket team during an epic tour that generated astonishing scenes of goodwill and camaraderie.

 

Apart from the scale, say observers, the wide-ranging nature of such visits was also something never seen in the past.  Pakistanis have been exposed to a hugely varied cross-section of the Indian society: from Bollywood stars to media professionals and from film directors to IT experts.  “The change that we see has not just come about at the government level, where one sees a visible slackening of bureaucratic resistance,” Mr Alam told the BBC News website.  “Even the public perception has changed radically,” he said.  Noted human rights activist and peace activist Asma Jehangir agrees.   “Not everyone who crossed borders this year was a peacenik. But they were all sucked up in the tide,” Ms Jehangir says.

 

Until recently, Ms Jehangir, a lawyer by profession, was riled by her colleagues at the bar councils for her pro-peace views.  She was often referred to as “shrimati” – an Indian title for a lady.  “Now most of them have been forced to admit that it was foolhardy to maintain a policy of continuing conflict,” she laughs.

 

Such was the momentum generated by Track II last year that even government figures from both sides could not resist jumping on the peace bandwagon.  The chief ministers of the divided province of Punjab paid complimentary visits, amid vociferous calls to forget the past.  And when governments on both sides allowed journalists to visit the disputed territory of Kashmir, it seemed to many observers that one of the greatest taboos had finally been laid to rest.  In an unprecedented move, the Indian government allowed a group of Pakistani journalists to visit Srinagar, and the Pakistan government reciprocated by letting Indian journalists into Muzaffarabad.   “We will undoubtedly see several hiccups as this process moves on,” says Ms Jehangir.  “But even if the government on either side tries to clamp down on such contacts now, it may not be possible because of technology.”

 

Hasan Zaidi, an independent film-maker and director of the Karachi-based film festival, Kara, points to other developments that are likely to make the governments think twice before trying to bring such activity to a halt.  Nazr, an Indian movie starring Pakistani screen diva Mira, is due for release and is likely to be screened in both countries soon.  Indian filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt told Kara participants at a seminar during the festival that had it not been for such cultural meets, the film would probably never have happened.  More importantly, the opening up of borders on this scale has led some Indian film distributors to look at Pakistan as a potential market for Indian movies.  At present, distributors have divided all of India into thirteen territories for distribution purposes. Pakistan potentially offers a market larger than any of these.  “Mumbai and Uttar Pradesh, the two largest territories, currently dictate the content emerging from Bollywood,” says Mr Zaidi. “If Pakistan becomes the 14th territory, it may only be a matter of time before it will start dictating content.”

 

One aspect of Track II efforts that has seriously excited observers, it seems, is the capacity of such activity to take the peace agenda away from Delhi and Islamabad.   Kara, for example, was widely discussed at the recent film festival at Goa.  Similarly, film companies are seriously thinking of setting up base in Dubai in order to get around the problem of screening their products in Pakistani cinemas.  Perhaps in order to ensure that the momentum generated in 2004 is not frittered away for want of a follow up, Track II activists are already gearing up for the year ahead.   SAFMA plans two major conferences of parliamentarians early next year, while major private TV networks are deep in the process of finishing a series of Dubai-based joint ventures with Pakistani and Indian stars.

 

The threat from the religious lobby remains omni-present.  “We are not against normalization with India,” says Mansoor Jaffar of the Islamic Jamaat-e-Islami party.  “But we feel that this Track II exercise is aimed at pushing the core issue of Kashmir into the background.”  His opinion, however, may no longer be a majority opinion.  Pakistani observers feel that while such rhetoric may continue unabated and official contacts between the two countries may remain hostage to history and red tapism, parallel diplomacy can indeed be the way forward towards normalization.  “Despite what the governments say or do there can be no reversal in the people's desire to stay in touch,” argues Ms Jehangir.  “And that I think is a fundamental shift in attitudes,” she says.

 

Full Story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4143737.stm

 

Couple bridge Kashmir's divide 

By Zulfiqar Ali, BBC correspondent in Keran, 15 December 2004 

 

The Pakistani-side relatives wave at separated family members.  The families were there, so were the gifts and the engagement ring.  But the tradition of placing ring on finger could not be fulfilled – the bride-to-be was on the other side of a 30-metre wide river.

 

This is Keran in the Neelum valley, 100 km (63 miles) northeast of Muzaffarabad, capital of Pakistani-administered Kashmir.  The Neelum River here forms part of the Line of Control that separates the Indian and Pakistani-held sections of Kashmir.  Mohammad Faizan Khan, 16, lives in the latter, his bride-to-be and paternal cousin, Samaira Bashir, on the Indian side.

Full Story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4097635.stm

 

*Sri Lanka

 

UN aid chief visits Tamil Tigers

BBC South Asia, 16 January 2005

 

The head of a UN aid agency has completed a visit to rebel-held territory in Sri Lanka despite initial objections by the government.  The head of the World Food Programme, James Morris, wanted to assess the aid effort for victims of Asia’s tsunami. The Colombo government originally deemed the trip to the northern town of Kilinochchi “difficult”. The government denies claims by the Tamil Tiger rebels that aid flows to their areas have been restricted.  “We are not involved in politics. We are involved in seeing that people are fed,” said Mr. Morris, who met SP Thamilselvan, the political chief of the Tigers.  “I would have been extraordinarily unhappy had I not been allowed to go,” he said.

 

The WFP says it is trying to feed some two million survivors across the region, including up to 750,000 people in Sri Lanka, where nearly 31,000 people died.   Mr. Morris said the WFP is providing food to 90,000 people in the rebel-controlled north, and the number is growing.  Canada’s Prime Minister Paul Martin also visited Sri Lanka on Sunday to assess the aid effort and to meet Canadian relief teams working in the country.   Peace talks between the rebels and government to bring an end to the country’s 33-year civil war broke down in 2003.

 

But despite the tensions over aid provision, there appeared to be fresh hope for the Norway-brokered talks process on Saturday with the Tamil announcement that Norwegian Foreign Minister Jan Petersen and top peace envoy Erik Solheim are set to visit the island next week.

Full Story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4177519.stm

 

 

PEACE & HARMONY ORGANIZATIONS

 

Friends:

We concluded the India Pakistan Peace and Goodwill Mission yesterday afternoon, (January 8, 2005), following a Press Conference at the Press Club at Mumbai, India.

Consisting of about 25 Non-resident Indians and Pakistanis from Canada, UK, and USA, and led by John Prabhudoss, the delegation had started our visit at Karachi, Pakistan, on the evening of December 27, 2004.  The delegation ranged from age 23 through 69. Some of them were born in the West, and were visiting India and Pakistan for the first time. A few others were returning to their country of origin after as many as 23 years.

Besides Karachi and Mumbai, we visited Peshawar, Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Lahore, Delhi and Jammu. We met government officials as well as political and religious leaders, lawyers, journalists, businessmen, peace activists, and representatives of labor and women’s groups. We were well received by all.  We delivered our Wagah Memorial Petition personally to Pakistan Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz and Congress President Sonia Gandhi.

We had a hectic schedule. Often we got up early and went to bed very late. At times we had to reach the venue of program directly from the airport or train station, or vice versa, without a breakfast or dinner.  Some of us took ill.  The highlight of our trip was our visit through the Khyber Pass to the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. It was offered to us and arranged by the Governor of the Northwest Frontier Province, complete with a military escort, and tea with the Tehsildar and Immigration Officer at Turkham border post. Also we had the good fortune to visit the ancient ruins of Taxila, near Rawalpindi, and the Golden Temple at Amritsar.

I will provide more details in my next report.
Pritam

 

 

REPORTS AND ANALYSES

 

Joint India Pakistan Peace and Goodwill Mission, December 27, 2004-January 8, 2005: A Report

Pritam K. Rohila, Ph.D.

 

The Joint India-Pakistan Peace and Goodwill Mission ended on the afternoon of Saturday, January 8, 2005, following a Press Conference at the Press Club, Mumbai, India. The delegation had started its visit at Karachi, Pakistan, on the evening of December 27, 2004.

 

Consisting of twenty-one Non-resident Indians and Non-resident Pakistanis from Canada, UK, and USA, the delegation was led by John Prabhudoss, the Executive Director of Washington, DC-based think-tank, Policy Institute for Religion and State.

 

No government or non-government organization had sponsored the delegation. Each member was responsible for his or her expenses.

 

The delegates ranged in age from 23 through 69. Some of them were born in the West, and were visiting India and Pakistan for the first time. Some were returning to their country of origin after as many as 23 years.

 

They included businessmen, community developers and organizers, economists, engineers, history scholars, investment managers, IT professionals, management consultants, psychologists, and realtors. Many were involved in non-government advocacy, peace and harmony, and relief and welfare organizations, some in executive capacity.  Captain Mohamed Suleman Mehtab had started his career in Pakistan Navy.

 

To promote peace between India and Pakistan and show solidarity with like-minded people of the region, the delegation met government officials, political and religious leaders, lawyers, journalists, businessmen, peace activists, and representatives of labor and women’s groups. The delegates wanted to demonstrate that Indians and Pakistanis could work together for peace, in spite of the differences in their professional training, religious affiliations, cultural background, national origin, political points of view, and personal experiences.

 

Besides Karachi and Mumbai, the delegation visited Peshawar, Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Lahore, Amritsar, Delhi and Jammu. Most places they were greeted warmly with garlands, high teas, and/or lunch and dinner receptions. At Karachi Gymkhana each delegate was welcomed with a Sindhi saropa. At Jammu, J&K Revenue, Relief and Rehabilitation Minister Hakeem Mohammad Yaseen presented a pashmina shawl to each woman delegate. Even the Indian and Pakistani immigration officers at the Wagah Border welcomed the delegates with a cup of tea.

 

The delegation purposely abstained from offering a political formula, or an action plan for the resolution of problems that have plagued India-Pakistan relationships for the last 57 years. Instead, they encouraged the peoples and governments to live like friends and good neighbors, while they work together to find peaceful and just resolution of all outstanding issues.

 

They emphasized everywhere the need for removal of visa restrictions. They believed that easy movement of people across the border would be of immense help in destroying the decades-old walls of suspicion and mistrust between the two neighbors. In New Delhi, The Indian Home Minister S. K. Patil assured the delegation of easier travel by the elderly and the handicapped across the Wagah Border.

 

At Wagah border the delegates offered interfaith prayers for the victims of the Partition-related violence, on both sides, in 1947. Also the delegation delivered a petition personally to Pakistan Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz at Islamabad, and the Congress President Sonia Gandhi at New Delhi The petition requested the two governments to build a suitable memorial at the Wagah Border to the innocent Hindu, Muslim and Sikh victims. Initiated by the Keizer, Oregon-based Association for Communal Harmony in Asia (ACHA), it had been signed by people from more than twenty countries.

 

In the course of their thirteen-day visit, the delegates met representatives of a number of peace and harmony organizations. With their help they hoped to revive in the people the same passion for peace between India and Pakistan, which had characterized the Indian Independence Movement, when Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs fought together for a common cause.

 

The delegates had a hectic schedule. Often they got up early and went to bed very late. At times they had to reach the venue of the next program directly from the airport or train station, or vice versa, without a breakfast or dinner. Some of them took ill.

 

Offered and arranged by General (Retd.) Iftikhar Jilani, the Governor of the Northwest Frontier Province, perhaps the delegation’s visit to the historic Khyber Pass and to the Pakistan-Afghanistan border was the most memorable of all events on its schedule. At Turkham border post, Bakhtiar Khan Mohmand, the Pakistani Tehsildar and Immigration Officer graciously entertained the delegates with tea and snacks. On the way back from Turkham, upon their arrival at the Corps Command Mess, musicians broke out in “ghar aya mera pardesi” tune followed by “baharo phool barsao, mera mehboob aya hai.”

 

Courtsey of their local hosts, the delegates had the good fortune to visit the ancient ruins of Taxila, near Rawalpindi, and the Jallianwala Bagh and the Golden Temple at Amritsar.

 

The longing for peace in people on both sides of the border made the delegates feel “Aag dono taraf hai baraber lagi huyi.” But at the government level, they could not help recall Ghalib’s couplet, “Aashqi sabr talab, aur tamana betab; Dil ka kya rang karun mein khoon-i-jigr honay tak.”

 

 

PEACE EVENTS

 

Jaipur Declaration at The Second National Convention of Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace (28 November 2004)

Free South Asia Of Nuclear Danger! Abolish Nuclear Weapons Worldwide Now!

The Second National Convention of the Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace (CNDP), India was held from 26th to 28th November 2004 at Jaipur, which has a glorious tradition of mobilizing for peace and had hosted numerous events including the 1956 Afro-Asian Conference.  It is held four years after the founding convention of the CNDP in Delhi and about six and a half years after India and Pakistan declaring themselves as nuclear weapons states following nuclear explosions in Pokhran, in India, and Chagai, in Pakistan. It may be recalled that the era of nuclear threat began with the mindless atomic bombings of the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the USA on 6th and 9th August 1945.

We, the assembled delegates at the Convention representing the peace movements in India and coming from various corners of the country, most emphatically reaffirm our firm conviction in reiteration of our Charter 2000: Nuclear weapons are means of mass destruction regardless of who wields them. They are weapons of genocide. They can impose horrendous suffering on victims across generations. They destroy the ecosystem. The damage they do is lasting and incurable. The sheer scale and character of the devastation they can cause makes them a profound and distinctive evil. For this and other reasons, the possession, use, or threat of use of nuclear weapons is absolutely immoral.  We also with equal emphasis reaffirm that the use, threat of use, or possession of, and even preparation for making, nuclear weapons is immoral, illegal, and politically unacceptable under any circumstances.  Not only that, nuclear deterrence is absolutely abhorrent to human sentiment since it implies that a state if required to defend its own existence will act with pitiless disregard for the consequences to its own and its adversary’s people.

We note with great concern the profoundly destabilizing effects of the nuclear blasts in May 1998. These have been most graphically and irrefutably demonstrated through an extremely dangerous (undeclared) border war in less than a year followed by a ten month long eyeball to eyeball massive confrontation all along the international border and the line of control. These confrontations were laden with the very real threats of nuclear exchange. The rulers of these two resource-starved countries remain unwaveringly stuck with their pernicious nuclear weapons program, which are a tragic diversion from addressing vital social needs. Though there have been no further blasts since 1998, in the teeth of massive waves of international censure – the race for developing nuclear warhead carrying missiles goes on unabated. And the possession of nuclear weapons is given a formal status through issuance of highly deplorable nuclear doctrines – based on the spurious and extremely dangerous theory of  “nuclear deterrence”.

We also note that both West Asia and Northeast Asia have emerged as the two other nuclear hotspots. The danger of unchecked spread of nuclear weapons to sundry state, and also perhaps non-state, actors through black market transfers of nuclear technology and fissile materials has exponentially escalated over the recent years.  This has only brought dangerously closer the prospects of a nuclear holocaust.

Most disturbing of all, the US, the original sinner, has aggressively taken to vertical proliferation, contemptuously throwing aside all international norms. They have, on the one hand embarked upon developing mini-nukes for actual use in the battlefield and, on the other, are going full steam ahead with Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) program – unilaterally abrogating international treaty obligations. The other nuclear weapons states have also done nothing to denuclearize.

We, therefore, clearly recognize the need to rededicate ourselves to the tasks of ridding South Asia and the world of the scourge of nuclear weapons. Towards that end, we the peace activists from India, call for at the global, and also national, level synergetic cooperation with the worldwide anti-war campaigns asking for immediate and unconditional withdrawal of the US-led occupying forces from the soil of Iraq. We do recognize the pivotal role of Iraqi resistance at this point of time, in undermining the US neo-con project for unfettered global domination, euphemistically labeled as the “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC). Hence we undertake to carry out the most vigorous campaign against the US occupation of Iraq, to conscientize the Indian public and pressure the national government, as any success of the so-called PNAC would turn the trigger happy new imperialists even more reckless and consequently have a serious negative impact on the prospects of global peace and disarmament. The Convention also extends its fullest support to the Palestinian people’s struggle for a secure and independent state of their own – free from Israeli aggression and occupation, which is backed by its mentor, the US.

We are also resolutely with the worldwide struggles for effective and total elimination of biological, chemical and radiological weapons, which threaten our gene pool. We further demand the universal banning of anti-personnel land mines and the “civilian” use of nuclear energy be made far more transparent, accountable and hazards free – in terms of both radiation exposure and safekeeping of fissile materials and to keep it clearly delinked from any weaponization program.

We do specifically recognize that especially in the Indian, and South Asian, context the ideology and politics of paranoia and hatred against the other internal and external, acts as the major driver for nuclear nationalism. Hence, we decide to make common cause with the myriad ongoing struggles against the forces of irrational, mindless, hateful and oppressive violence and towards more harmonious and inclusive social orders in order to reinforce the struggle for peace and nuclear disarmament.

We also take special note of the importance of fighting the ideology of aggression and violence being continually disseminated in the fields of education and popular culture and the need to counter in a forceful and innovative manner.

At the specifically national and regional levels, we pledge our full support to the popular initiatives for better understanding and friendship between India and Pakistan. We call upon both the governments to pay serious heed to the popular urgings to reduce and eliminate the risks of nuclear confrontation – accidental or intentional. In fact, even the 2000 Charter had made detailed and specific demands asking for immediate halt and eventual reversal of nuclear weaponization programs in the region, which, sadly enough, have as yet gone unheeded. The Prime Ministers of India and Pakistan have just met. We call upon both the governments to engage seriously in meaningful dialogue to bring about peace and amity, and also address themselves to the problems of all of Jammu & Kashmir taking into account the authentic desires of all sections of the people of that region.

We, similarly, pledge our full support to any and every effort to bring about better and improved relations among the peoples and the governments of the region, particularly the SAARC countries.  We call for a yearly ten percent reduction in defense expenditure by India and Pakistan and urge the countries and peoples of South Asia to move towards the elimination of war.

At the global level, we decide, and call upon all peace activists, to join forces with the reinvigorated global campaign for total and complete abolition of all nuclear weapons. The May 2005 NPT Review Conference is the immediate focus of intervention.  The Mayors for Peace are spearheading the global effort to eliminate nuclear weapons by the year 2020. They have a membership of over six hundred cities spread over more than a hundred countries and are carrying out the campaign in collaboration with peace groups and networks all the world over and with endorsement from the European Union Parliament and also backing from some other state actors including the constituents of the seven member New Agenda Coalition and also the NAM – currently chaired by Malaysia. The year 2005, it is further noted, is profoundly significant being the 60th year of the tragic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and also the 50th year of the Bandung Conference establishing the Non-Aligned Movement calling for global disarmament.

We pledge to carry forward the campaign for freeing South Asia from the scourge of nuclear threats, as an inalienable and critical component of the global struggle for nuclear weapons free world, in the most vigorous manner. Towards this end, at the national level, we commit ourselves to launching a massive campaign in various forms to educate the people about the dire threat posed by nuclear weapons and rivalry in South Asia.

South Asians Against Nukes (SAAN): An informal information platform for activists & scholars concerned about the dangers of nuclearization in South Asia

SAAN Mailing List: To subscribe send a blank message to: saan_-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


SAAN Website: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/sacw/saan
[OLD URL: http://www.mnet.fr/aiindex/NoNukes.html]
SAAN Mailing List Archive: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SAAN_/
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
DISCLAIMER: Opinions expressed in materials carried in the posts do not necessarily reflect the views of SAAN compilers.  Materials carried in the posts do not necessarily reflect the views of SAAN compilers.

 
[The posting below is being resent along with the route because of requests from many people interested in joining the padyatra for route details.  Kindly register as soon as possible to join the Padyatra/Peace March.  Visa formalities will take time]
 
 
India-Pakistan Peace March, Delhi to Multan, 23 March – 11 May 2005
 
Probably nowhere in the world we have a situation where people are as emotionally entwined as between India and Pakistan and yet there is an enmity thrust upon them. The cruel turn of events in the history resulted in political separation even though the majority of common people were never consulted and the world witnessed a bloody mass cross movement of people. Family links were severed and a deep scar was left. Even the post partition history has remained quite tumultuous interspersed with four wars and loss of innumerable valuable lives. Kashmir remains a sore point between India and Pakistan threatening to take both countries to self-destruction. Even though the common people never want violence and hatred, the fundamentalist elements on both sides as well as the political compulsions have ensured that the animosity will continue to take heavy toll on both sides.
 
Common people on both sides are now fed up with violence and atmosphere of antagonism. They want friendship, peace and normal relations to be established between the two countries. We have seen that even though the governments of the two countries may be suspicious of each other whenever the common people of the two countries get to meet all walls of reservation against each other melt as warm emotions of affinity surge. It is almost like people of same family meeting each other after years of separation. The enmity, hatred and distance is only artificial and soon gives way to warmth, friendship and camaraderie.
 
We feel that if real peace and friendship has to be established between India and Pakistan, the initiative will have to be taken by people of the two countries. The governments will merely follow the will of the people. So far, the governments have tried to create an artificial barrier between the two countries preventing easy access to the other country and free mingling among the people. However, now there is a subtle change in the atmosphere.  The governments seem more willing than before to allow the people of two countries to interact freely and also seem to be supportive of the people-to-people level initiatives. Various initiatives are being undertaken to bring down the artificial wall between India and Pakistan. We plan to organize a peace march between Delhi and Multan beginning March 23, 2005. The long march will allow peace loving people of both countries to participate in the grassroots initiative for peace and friendship and will help build an atmosphere among the common people of the two countries which will ultimately persuade the two governments to follow suit.
 
For more details about the peace march or interest in participating in the peace march you may contact the following.
 
Contact in Pakistan: KARAMAT ALI, e-mail: piler@cyber.net.pk
Contact in India: SANDEEP PANDEY, e-mail: ashaashram@yahoo.com
 
Please visit our website at www.thesouthasian.org and subscribe to indpakpeacemarch@yahoogroups.com to receive regular information about the peace march or send mail to moderator at
indopakpeacemarch@yahoo.co.uk
 
*********************************************************************************************
All persons wishing to march must register as soon as possible with their passport details.
*********************************************************************************************