---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACHA PEACE BULLETIN

http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/ACHAPeaceBulletin

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A publication of Association for Communal Harmony in Asia (ACHA)

 www.asiapeace.org  &  www.indiapakistanpeace.org

 

Editor:  Pritam K. Rohila, PhD           asiapeace@comcast.net

 

Subscription is free.

To SUBSCRIBE, email a request to ACHAPeaceBulletin-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email the request to ACHAPeaceBulletin-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com 

 

 

Volume XII, No. 3, March 15, 2008, Next Issue, April 15, 2008

 

______________________________________________________________________________

CONTENTS

 

EDITORIAL

*Peace: Whose responsibility is it? Pritam K. Rohila, Ph. D.

LETTERS      

*Shared heritage of Indians and Pakistanis, Dr. Ali Rizvi

AWARDS

*Lawyers & Judges of Pakistan

BOOKS

*The Pathan Unarmed: Opposition & Memory in the North West Frontier, M. Banerjee

CALL FOR PAPERS/PROPOSALS

*September 11-14, Portland, Oregon, USA: BUILDING CULTURES OF PEACE

EVENTS

*April 2008, New Delhi, India: EXPRESSIONS OF DEVOTION IN ISLAM,

*April 6, Salem, Oregon, USA: AWAKENING THE SEEDS OF ONENESS

*October 4-7, Koach, Kerala, India: SPIRITUALITY AND ENVIRONMENT

*December 3-9, 2009, Melbourne, Australia: Parliament of the World’s

Religions

EVENT REPORTS

PEACE & HARMONY NEWS FROM INDIA & PAKISTAN

PEACE & HARMONY NEWS FROM SOUTH ASIA

UPDATE: KASHMIR

UPDATE: NEPAL

UPDATE: PAKISTAN

UPDATE: SRI LANKA

*The LTTE in Crisis, G. H. Peiris, South Asia Intelligence Review, March 10, 2008.

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

EDITORIAL

 

*Peace: Whose responsibility is it? Pritam K. Rohila, Ph. D.

 

It is not uncommon for us to blame our governments and leaders for war, violence and conflict around us. But governments can only negotiate peace treaties and make laws. They cannot make peace yield its full dividend, without active involvement of common people.

 

As good citizens of our nations and the world, we have to do more than just talk about peace. Peace demonstrations and vigils are okay, but not sufficient by themselves.

 

We have to believe in and act peace in our daily life. We have to open up our hearts to others. We have to welcome people from across our borders, even if they speak a different language, or pray to the God of a different name. We have to embrace people in our neighborhoods and in our local communities irrespective of their beliefs or social station. And we have to respect members of our own families regardless of their gender or age.

 

From our hearts, we need to drive out the demons of anger, hate, prejudice and despair, and replace them with the angels of love, fairness and hope.

 

Making peace and living in peace with others around us is not easy. As Immanuel Kant in his 1795 essay, “Perpetual Peace,” opined, for peace we have to strive hard.

 

The sooner we start the easier and better it will be for all of us.

 

LETTERS        

 

*Shared heritage of Indians and Pakistanis, Dr. Ali Rizvi  AARIZVI@aol.com

 

My parents are from Delhi, and my wife's from Hyderabad (Deccan). They settled in Lahore and Karachi respectively, and I was brought up in Pakistan (mostly in the Himalayan North West Frontier, and Lahore for medical education). Recently we took our 2 children to India and Pakistan (the first time back for me after 18 years in the U.S.). We went to India first, and stayed at a bed-and-breakfast with a wonderful Indian family; it felt like home! Our driver in Delhi and Agra was from Nepal, and the cook from Bengal (he prepared delicious meals for us!). I made a special point to visit my father's old house in Old Delhi, and also paid a visit to Gandhi Samadhi, in addition to various sites in the city. We had the best time. The people were so friendly, especially the schoolchildren whom we saw walking everywhere in their uniforms in a disciplined fashion. We then proceeded to go to Karachi to stay with family and meet my aging parents. Again, we were struck by the affability and welcoming attitude of the common people (in spite of the unfortunate Benazir Bhutto event that happened while we were there). Needless to say our children were thrilled to meet their cousins as well.

 

It was a life-changing experience for us; one that I had never expected would impact us so much. I think broadening our visit to include both countries was the key. What I took away from our trip was this: the people of the subcontinent have so much in common: a shared heritage of land, history, language, culture, traditions, music, food, dress,...yes! even our thoughts and goals......I could go on and on. Our common themes are stronger and more numerous than our differences (even the latter are merely a manifestation of our richness and diversity, as I see it). It is sad that at times we have chosen to accentuate our presumed differences to the extent of going to war, launching an arms race, and fan the flames of hatred.

 

Yet, when I reflect upon our recent first-hand interactions with the "men (and women) on the street", and as long as the spirit of our common humanity is alive, I see cause for hope. I wish ordinary citizens could change things....and perhaps they can, by refusing to bow to fear, ignorance, and prejudice. I am reminded of these lines by Omar Khayyam,

 

           "Ah love! Could thou and I with fate conspire

           To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire

           Would not we shatter it to pieces, and then

           Re-mould it nearer to the heart's desire"!

 

AWARDS

 

*Lawyers & Judges of Pakistan


According to the announcement by T. Kumar (
tkumar@aiusa.org), its Advocacy Director for Asia & Pacific,  Amnesty International (www.amnestyusa.org), at its meeting on March 4, 2008, with the detained leaders of the Pakistan Lawyers Movement, presented two awards. One award was for the Judges and the other award was for the Lawyers Movement. The citation read as below:

1) Amnesty International US Salutes the Lawyers Movement of
Pakistan who stood up during the recent state of emergency in defense of an independent judiciary.


2)  Amnesty International
USA Salutes the Judges of Pakistan's court, who stood up during the recent state of emergency in defense of an independent judiciary.


BOOKS

 

*The Pathan Unarmed: Opposition & Memory in the North West Frontier, Mukulika Banerjee, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000. ISBN: 0933452691, x + 238pp., map, photographs, glossary, references, index, $29.95

Review by Akbar S. Ahmed, American University

In 1973 I found myself in a vast sea of humanity in Peshawar waiting for the return from self-exile of the legendary Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, then 83 years old. I was deputy secretary in charge of Home and Tribal Affairs in the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP), and my direct boss, the home secretary, would not have been pleased to see me waiting to welcome such a renowned leader of the opposition. But as a junior officer interested in studying Pathan culture I could not resist the temptation of glimpsing the most famous living Pathan of our age. Although the film Gandhi, released a decade later, would depict him as a close and respected companion of Gandhi, Ghaffar Khan remains a little-known figure.

Mukulika Banerjee, in The Pathan Unarmed, throws light on Ghaffar Khan, also known as Bacha Khan or, in India, as the Frontier Gandhi, and on the Khudai Khidmatgar, or the “servants of God,” movement. An anthropologist, Banerjee explores the important question of how a warlike society can produce a leader like Bacha Khan, dedicated to nonviolence.

Banerjee argues—correctly—that Bacha Khan drew not from Gandhian thought but on the ideology of the movement, a combination of Islam and Pukhtunwali, the code of the Pathans. Ultimately, Bacha Khan would appeal to the Pathans’ sense of religious tradition and honor: “Have some sense of honor … in the cause of Islam” (p. 154). For Pathans, the Gandhian inspiration was weak, and their own traditions contained solutions for their problems. Banerjee points out how the movement struggled to remain aloof from the communal violence as religious conflict intensified over the 1930s until the creation of Pakistan in 1947. Banerjee, in short, argues that Bacha Khan’s nonviolent movement was different in its philosophical provenance from that of Gandhi but that it was equally successful in achieving what Max Weber had considered impossible, that is, a successful application of ethics to politics.

In the 1930s Bacha Khan and his followers faced a total ban, imprisonment, and confiscation of property. Houses were burned and crops destroyed. Entire villages were blockaded, and demonstrating volunteers were often fired on and killed. In the Kohat Valley, firing on protesters resulted in 50 deaths. Banerjee does great service to these forgotten heroes of the nationalist movement by reminding readers of their sacrifice: “The civil disobedience campaign carried out by these Khudai Khidmatgar recruits between 1930 and 1934 was arguably the most heroic and extraordinary of all such episodes in the Indian nationalist movement” (p. 71).

In 1947 Bacha Khan once again displayed wisdom and moral courage. He refused to be part of the referendum in the NWFP, arguing that agitation would lead to violence and bloodshed. On the creation of Pakistan he took the formal oath of allegiance, but the NWFP government was dismissed and Bacha Khan and his followers branded as “friends of Gandhi” and “traitors to Pakistan.” Bacha Khan and his followers felt a sense of betrayal by both Pakistan and India. Bacha Khan’s last words to Gandhi were: “You have thrown us to the wolves” (p. 189).

Honored in India, where government took the unprecedented step of offering him a future resting place next to Gandhi’s mausoleum, and vilified in Pakistan, Bacha Khan understandably wished to be buried in the garden of his house in Jalalabad in Afghanistan, where he had spent most of his later life. His funeral was attended by many world leaders, including Rajiv Gandhi, the prime minister of India.

Unfortunately, in Banerjee’s book there are a few spelling mistakes of important terms and incorrect definitions that need to be corrected. Some examples: the North-West Frontier Province, or the NWFP, was never called the North West Frontier; the word for an elder is mashar, not mushar; zakat, one of the five pillars of Islam, requires that two and a half percent of earnings and wealth be paid to the community and not 10 percent; the word for funeral is janaza, not jehnaza. In addition, there are bibliographic errors. For example, my book Resistance and Control in Pakistan, about the South Waziristan Agency, is cited as having been published in 1985, rather than in 1991, the correct year.

In spite of the errors, Banerjee’s book is a good read, raising important theoretical questions. It is written with passion and intelligence. Bacha Khan’s message of nonviolence and compassion is more relevant than ever before, given that after September 2001 Islam is universally identified with violence and terrorism.

CALL FOR PAPERS/PROPOSALS

 

*September 11-14, Portland, Oregon, USA: BUILDING CULTURES OF PEACE is theme of the 6th Annual Conference of the Peace and Justice Studies Association to be held in conjunction with the Peace and Conflict Studies Consortium of Portland State University.

 

Also, for the first time, women’s issues will be one of the focuses at this conference. To fulfill this purpose, we are looking for proposals specifically addressing women’s issues in the pursuit of peace and justice. We specifically would like to find proposals which discuss gender violence both domestic and international, especially with programming and techniques for reducing gender violence and empowering women.

 

Other areas of interest for the conference include Peace Education in Colleges and Universities; Peace Education from Birth through High School; Race, Class and Intersectionality; Art, Media and Communications; Responding to Genocide and War; Theories of Nonviolence and Conflict Resolution; Grassroots Organizing, Coalitions and Movements; Environmental Sustainability and Alternative Futures; Faith and Peace; Film; Authorial Book Readings.

 

Proposals may be made in the form of 1) research papers, 2) workshops, 3) roundtable discussions, or 4) other presentations (such as those associated with posters or film screenings). You will need to submit an abstract of no more than 300 words along with your contact details and the preferred format of your proposal.

 

Undergraduates in particular are encouraged to submit proposals for the student poster session.

 

As the PJSA mission statement says, "We are dedicated to bringing together academics, K-12 teachers and grassroots activists to explore alternatives to violence and share visions and strategies for peace-building, social justice, and social change." Therefore, we seek contributions that explore how to build a culture of peace in research, teaching and action.

 

Proposals are invited by April 1, 2008.DEADLINE for submission of proposals is April 1, 2008.

 

For more information, please contact me at jvcphd@gmail.com but do not submit proposals via this address. Proposals will only be accepted through the online form available at:

http://www.peacejusticestudies.org/conference/submitprop.php.

 

EVENTS

*April 2008, New Delhi, India: SEMINAR ON AQEEDAT KE RANG: EXPRESSIONS OF DEVOTION IN ISLAM, being organized by Indira Gandhi National Centre for the
Arts, has issued a call for papers. Prospective presenters are requested to contact Fazal at
fazzur@gmail.com

 

*April 6, Salem, Oregon, USA: AWAKENING THE SEEDS OF ONENESS is the theme of the

interfaith service being sponsored by the Oneness Coalition at 4:00 p.m., at Morningside United

Methodist Church, 3674 12th St SE. The service will start with prelude music starting at 3:45 p.

m. and will feature songs, readings and other inspiration from Hindu, Jewish, Catholic,

Protestant, Buddhist, Sikh, Muslim, Baha'i and Native American faith traditions. More info from

Curt McCormack kerceykent@yahoo.com 

 

*October 4-7, Koach, Kerala, India: SPIRITUALITY AND ENVIRONMENT is theme of the World Fellowship of Inter-Religious Councils (WFIRC) Assembly 2008, at the Renewal  Centre,Azad Road, Koach-682017 in Kerala, India. Registration fee is Rs.  500 to meet the expenses, in part, of boarding and lodging. More info from Justice P.K.Shamsuddin, President WFIRC,           S.R.M.Road, Kochi-682018, Kerala, India, Tel. 0484-402993/9446572993, pkshamsuddin@rediffmail.com, and Fr. Albert Nambiaparambil cmi,           Secretary General, WFIRC, Upasana,Thodupuzha-685 584, Kerala, India, Tel 04862-223286/9446131173, upasanadr@dataone.in & Upasana_dr@satyam.net.in


*December 3-9, 2009, Melbourne, Australia:
The 2009 Parliament of the World’s Religions, will bring together the world’s religious and spiritual communities, their leaders and their followers to a gathering where peace, diversity and sustainability are discussed and explored in the context of interreligious understanding and cooperation.

Parliament participants will work with others and within their own traditions to craft faithful responses to:

  • indigenous reconciliation
  • global poverty and global warming
  • environmental care and degradation
  • education of the young and the challenges of social disengagement
  • voluntary and forced migration
  • artistic expression and spirituality and
  • the value of sports
  • ethnic and religious tensions.

More info from http://www.parliamentofreligions2009.org/home.php

EVENT REPORTS

 

*February 17, 2008, Toronto, ON, Canada: Faiz Peace Festival On Saturday last, February 16th 2008 , at the Port Credit Secondary School in Mississauga , 600 people - including many full families - gathered to celebrate the memory of the revolutionary Urdu poet Faiz Ahmad Faiz (1911-1984). It was the first Faiz Peace Festival to be held outside Pakistan and was a wondrous occasion of memory, poetry, and political reflection and solidarity which lasted over 5 hours. Faiz’ daughter, Muneeza Hashmi, arrived for the event from Pakistan, bringing greetings from his family and a new documentary film made by her son. Professional and community singers and musicians from Pakistan, India and Bangladesh performed Faiz’s poems in music throughout the night; Mafa, a dancer from South Africa presented a unique collaboration with Askari, a community Pakistani musician on Faiz’ one poem on Africa; Adam Hanieh, of Palestine House, spoke of Faiz’ familiarity with the Palestinian and Arab liberation struggles and his impact on the intellectuals from that region; and Cheran, a poet from Sri Lanka powerfully recited Faiz poems in Tamil translation. Barrister Hamid Bashani Khan spoke on current political situation in Pakistan .Aparna Sundar, a professor of Politics at Ryerson University, spoke of the need to deepen friendship between India and Pakistani people in the GTA , while Ashfaq Hussain, of Asian Television News, gave an eloquent criticism of Faiz’ poems in Urdu. Most enjoyably, Punjabi and Pakistani youth groups danced and presented a youth-driven interpretation of contemporary politics. The evening ended with a collective sing-along of Faiz’ poems “Hum Dekhenge” (We Will find a New Dawn”). The event was organized by the South Asian Peoples Forum, a new political collective in the GTA, which has the promotion of the views of ‘anti-imperialism’ and ‘secularism’ in its mandate. SAPF coordinator was ably assisted by Terik Hameed and other artistes in the South Asian community, who volunteered their enthusiasm and energy. Professor Sara Abraham of university of Toronto ,  Dr. Khalid Sohail,  Syed Azeem, Amer Hussain Jafery, Smina Rayaz, and Zhera Abbas spoke on the occasion.

 

PEACE & HARMONY NEWS FROM INDIA & PAKISTAN

 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IndiaPakistanPeaceDay/

 

PEACE & HARMONY NEWS FROM SOUTH ASIA

 

http://groups.google.com/group/peace--harmony-news-from-south-asia

 

UPDATE: KASHMIR

 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/KashmirSolutionsForum/

 

UPDATE: NEPAL

 

http://www.sajaforum.org/2008/02/nepal-time-asia.html

 

UPDATE: PAKISTAN

 

*Beena Sarwar updates http://groups.yahoo.com/group/beena-issues/   

*Free and Fair Election Network (FAFEN), Islamabad http://www.fafen. org

*Pakistan Elections Commission http://ecp.gov.pk/content/GE2008.htm

*http://www.teeth.com.pk/blog/ 

UPDATE: SRI LANKA

 

*The LTTE in Crisis, G. H. Peiris, (Professor Emeritus of the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka), South Asia Intelligence Review, Volume 6, No. 35, March 10, 2008.

In the past few weeks there have been many media reports that point to the prevalence of confusion and disarray among the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE/Tigers) in the face of heavy losses inflicted by the armed forces of the Government of Sri Lanka. Apart from many references to injury sustained by the LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran in the course of an aerial bombardment in November 2007, there was some speculation that he may even have died. [Claims of Prabhakaran’s death may be set to rest after Prabhakaran’s ‘public appearance’ at the funeral of the pro-LTTE Tamil National Alliance Member of Parliament, P. Sivanesan, in the rebel-held Wanni area, of which the LTTE released photographs on March 9, 2008]. The specificities that embellish these reports, though ignored by spokesmen for the LTTE, have been refuted with disdain by several pro-LTTE writers. Given the questionable credibility of ‘news’ originating from either side of the great divide, it has seldom been possible to sort out the truth from fiction in the stories on the confrontational aspects of the Sri Lankan conflict. What can, consequently, be attempted is, first, to contextualise the recent surge of media attention on turbulences in the shrinking Tiger habitat of the ‘Vanni’ in northern Sri Lanka, without speculating on whether its leader is dead or dying or hibernating prior to a deadly leap at the jugular, and then, to synthesise the information on what prevails at present, extractable from sources less contaminated by propaganda objectives.

In the chequered history of the LTTE spanning the past three decades during which Prabhakaran has held sway as its supreme leader, there have been several spells over which its insurrectionary capacity suffered serious setbacks. Prominent among such recessions were: the brief eclipse of the LTTE in the aftermath of the Indian peace-keeping intervention in 1987; the worldwide anti-Tiger revulsion evoked by the assassination of former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991; the strategic losses consequent upon its expulsion by the Sri Lankan armed forces from the Jaffna peninsula in 1995; the constraining effects on its international operations generated by the global tide of hostility towards terrorism following the al-Qaeda attack on the United States in 2001; and, more far-reaching in impact than any other, the internal revolt led by ‘Colonel Karuna’ in March 2004. The impression conveyed by the experiences in each of these episodes, however, is that the LTTE possessed the inner resilience and the external support required for recovery, if not entirely unscathed, at least with sufficient strength to persist with its campaign of warfare and terror. By contrast, the losses suffered in the more recent past appear to constitute an irreversible and aggravating trend featured by indications that could well portend a final collapse.

Despite the weakening of its grip on the eastern lowlands that resulted from the calamitous breakaway of the Karuna group, the LTTE leadership persisted with unswerving commitment to its goal of establishing a sovereign Tamil nation-state – ‘Eelam’ – encompassing the entire ‘northeast’ of Sri Lanka, the pledges of the ceasefire agreement of February 2000 notwithstanding. As in earlier times, its efforts were directed mainly at enhancement of military strength, expanding the territory under its control in the Northern and Eastern provinces and eliminating its rivals in that part of the country, mobilising international support for its cause, and destabilising the Government of Sri Lanka through carefully regulated intimidation and terror. That instigating a Sinhalese backlash of violence against the Tamils living outside the northeast – a re-enactment of 1983 – also remained a prime objective was underscored by the assassination of Sri Lanka’s charismatic Foreign Minister, Lakshman Kadirgamar, a provocative outrage committed in the final days of Chandrika Kumaratunga’s presidential tenure.

Colombo-based politics of the country during this period remained in a state of flux, featured by both frequent changes of the power configuration as well as intense electoral rivalry. Given the fact that the release of the foreign aid pledged by the donors remained conditional on progress being made towards a negotiated settlement of the conflict, Government policy had to accommodate two mutually conflicting needs – that of strengthening security and defence in the face of the mounting Tiger threat, on the one hand, and persistence with credible peace overtures to the LTTE, on the other. The latter encountered the almost insurmountable problem of fierce inter-party dissension on what could be offered to the Tigers without endangering the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Sri Lanka.

On the eve of the presidential election of November 2005 Prabhakaran enforced a boycott of the polls in the north and parts of the eastern lowlands where Ranil Wickremasinghe, former Prime Minister and a frontrunner of the presidential stakes, would have attracted substantially more support than his rival Mahinda Rajapakse. This decision appears, in retrospect, to have been a monumental blunder that marks the onset of a drastic change in the fortunes of Prabhakaran’s Eelam campaign. The boycott decision was evidently based upon the premise that Wickremasinghe, hailed internationally as the ‘peace candidate’, if elected, would, with his commitment to power-sharing under a federal system of Government, place in serious jeopardy the case for a secessionist campaign. Prabhakaran’s expectation was that Rajapakse, if successful in his presidential bid, backed as he was by electoral allies vehemently opposed to a political compromise involving devolution of power to the northeast, would actually attempt to implement his campaign pledges to jettison the ceasefire agreement, to evict the "White Tigers" (Norwegians) from their role as facilitators of peace negotiations, and to discard the notion of LTTE being the sole representative of the Tamils. Such a hawkish approach, the LTTE leadership believed, would pave the way for a resumption of military confrontations in earnest, backed by vastly enhanced international sympathy and support for the rebels’ cause.

Having contributed to Rajapakse’s victory at the election, the LTTE leaders began to test the resolve of the new President. Thus, while articulating with greater vehemence than ever before their earlier demands for Government intervention in disarming the Karuna group, and for constitutional power over the northeast pending a final resolution of the conflict, they launched a series of guerrilla attacks and acts of terrorism which, in April 2006, reached the heart of Colombo’s defence establishment in the near-successful attempt to assassinate the Commander of the Sri Lanka Army, Lt. Gen. Sarath Fonseka.

The sharply escalating level of violence did not evoke a retaliatory response from the Government, at least for some time. Rajapakse persisted with his pursuit of peace, risking, in the process, the support of some of his parliamentary allies. He established an ‘All-Party Representative Committee’ tasked with formulating constitutional reforms based on the axiom of devolution. He backed the Norwegian efforts at facilitating fresh peace negotiations, expressing a solemn hope that the brief meeting between delegates of the Government and the LTTE staged at Geneva in February 2006 would mark the resumption of a continuing dialogue with the Tiger leadership. Rajapakse was also reported to have made a ‘secret’ attempt to establish direct contact with the LTTE high-command, knowing fully well that the attempt would not be kept concealed from Sri Lanka’s friends abroad. The intensifying LTTE violence, however, could not be ignored indefinitely. From the commencement of Rajapakse’s presidency up to the bomb attack on the Army Commander (approximately 150 days), 150 armed services personnel, in addition to about 150 civilians, had been killed by the LTTE. The animosity between the LTTE and the security forces had reached such fever pitch, and the nationalists’ pressure for some retaliation had become so intense that the President was eventually compelled to initiate a series of air strikes on identified LTTE bases. Nevertheless, as the President had surmised, the continuing belligerence of the LTTE, on the one hand, and the show of restraint by the Government, on the other, did resonate in the policy stances, vis-à-vis Sri Lanka, of several western Governments, both in a substantially enhanced flow of aid as well as in the imposition of sanctions on the LTTE in member-states of the EU and in Canada in May-June 2006.

The repercussions of Prabhakaran’s capricious gamble at the presidential polls soon instilled into his strategy a sense of desperation. This found expression in a series of ‘Sea Tiger’ attacks (including an act of piracy) that evoked strictures from several quarters including the Secretary General of the UN and the Head of the Scandinavian ‘Ceasefire Monitoring Mission’ stationed in Sri Lanka. Prabhakaran retaliated by demanding the removal of all non-Norwegian members of the Monitoring Mission from the northeast. The tempo of violence was increased further with a spate of attacks on military and civilian targets in all parts of the country. Then came the major military showdown in the eastern lowlands that began on July 20, 2006, in the form of a ‘riparian’ confrontation in the irrigation channel system of Mavil Aru (south of Trincomalee) which compelled the Government to retaliate in earnest, with a nod of approval from the US. Thereafter, following a series of bloody battles that lasted up until mid-2007 in the course of which the LTTE incurred heavy losses, the rebels were finally evicted from the entire Eastern Province